Healthcare lagged the S&P by 50%. The picks-and-shovels crowd is back.
Baillie Gifford's healthcare research argues rate hikes, post-Covid profit collapses and political risk crushed the sector through 2024 — and that the 3Q26 rotation is rewarding the toolmakers, not the drug inventors.
- Healthcare stocks lagged the S&P 500 by approximately 50 percent in the two years leading up to the end of 2024, per Baillie Gifford research. m:…7587
- Sharp rate increases tightened biotech funding, while uncertainty around regulation, drug pricing and research budgets weighed on investor sentiment; post-pandemic profit declines hit vaccine, diagnostic and bioprocessing suppliers. m:…7587
- Baillie Gifford's picks-and-shovels picks: Medpace, leveraging rising R&D spend without direct scientific risk; Thermo Fisher Scientific, which the company says spends more than $1bn a year on R&D; and Illumina, a genomic powerhouse on its dominant installed base. Self-reported m:…7587
- GLP-1 medicines for diabetes and obesity already represent a global market exceeding $50bn, per Baillie Gifford. m:…7587
- Baillie Gifford's ownership research notes the Novo Nordisk Foundation is the controlling shareholder of Novo Nordisk and the William Demant Foundation the majority shareholder of Demant. m:…2558
- Energy, healthcare, and financials rallied in 3Q26 as market leadership broadened meaningfully beyond technology, per DBS. m:…8979
The wreckage
Across the two years leading up to the end of 2024, healthcare stocks lagged the S&P 500 by approximately 50 percent, according to Baillie Gifford's research. That is the hole the sector has been climbing out of. m:…7587
The damage had three drivers. Sharp interest-rate increases tightened capital availability and funding for biotech ventures. Uncertainty around regulation, drug pricing reforms and research budgets dented investor sentiment. And post-pandemic dislocations hit the profits of businesses that aided the fight against Covid-19 — vaccine producers, diagnostic test makers and bioprocessing suppliers. m:…7587
Why the toolmakers
Baillie Gifford's answer is the picks-and-shovels trade: own the companies that sell into R&D spending rather than the ones taking scientific risk. Medpace, the research argues, is leveraging the sector's increasing R&D spend without bearing direct scientific risk. Thermo Fisher Scientific, which the company says spends more than $1bn annually on research and development, is the category's anchor tenant. m:…7587
Illumina gets the same treatment: Baillie Gifford calls it a "genomic powerhouse" with a strong competitive edge from its dominant installed base and broad technological capabilities. The backdrop helps: GLP-1 medicines for diabetes and obesity already represent a global market exceeding $50 billion. m:…7587
The ownership filter
A second Baillie Gifford note adds the ownership filter. When business leaders have skin in the game through significant ownership stakes, they are more likely to make decisions with persistence and long-term vision; inside-owned businesses tend to be more innovative, file more patents and spend more on research and development, while family-run firms prioritize resilience, reinvestment and cultural preservation over short-term thinking. m:…2558
The examples are healthcare-adjacent and instructive. The philanthropic Novo Nordisk Foundation is the controlling shareholder of the drugmaker Novo Nordisk; the William Demant Foundation is the majority shareholder of Demant, the hearing-health company. Other examples in the note: Adrian Gore retains a 7 per cent direct holding in Discovery, Technoprobe remains majority-owned by the Crippa family, and Investor AB is the largest shareholder of Atlas Copco. The counter-cyclical playbook comes from outside healthcare: Ryanair chief executive Michael O'Leary — who holds a 4 per cent stake in Ryanair — ordered 75 new Boeing aircraft in December 2020, when 90 out of 96 European airlines made under €1 profit per seat in 2019. m:…2558
This suggests a loop: ownership structures that let managers think in decades produce the R&D budgets the toolmakers feed on. Baillie Gifford practices the doctrine itself — the firm notes it intervened to thwart an attempted takeover of Scout24 in 2019. m:…2558
The rotation arrived
Then the market moved. DBS reports that energy, healthcare, and financials rallied in the third quarter of 2026, as market leadership broadened meaningfully beyond technology. For a sector that lagged the S&P 500 by approximately 50 percent in the two years to the end of 2024, that is the rotation Baillie Gifford's research argued the toolmakers were set up to capture. m:…8979 m:…7587
The honest caveat, from Baillie Gifford's own note: the exact timing of a full sector rebound remains uncertain, and the uncertainty around regulation, drug pricing and research budgets has not gone away. The picks-and-shovels case is a positioning argument, not a prediction — and the risk is the cycle itself, since sharp rate increases already tightened biotech funding once. m:…7587
What is still unresolved
- The exact timing of a full healthcare sector rebound.
- Whether the regulatory overhang around drug pricing and research budgets eases or hardens.
- How durable the 3Q26 rotation into healthcare proves if tech re-accelerates.
Provenance by Synorb. Every claim links to its source. This story was written by an agent from the Manifests listed below. Read the methodology and limitations, or send a correction.
Free to reuse, including commercially. Credit “Hanging Context, with provenance by Synorb” and link to this story. Keep the cited Manifest ids. Reuse terms v1.