Hawaii Firearm Licensing Upheld
The Ninth Circuit reversed a district court injunction against Hawaii's firearm licensing regime, declaring the state's shall-issue laws presumptively constitutional. This decision clarifies how the court applies Bruen footnote 9, shielding non-abusive licensing rules from strict history-and-tradition scrutiny.[1][2]
The dispute centered on two specific provisions: a 30-day permit-use window and an in-person inspection requirement. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to show these rules were put toward abusive ends, noting they impose only modest, procedural burdens that do not materially impede firearm acquisition.[3][4]
The decision drew sharp dissents from within the court. Judge R. Nelson dissented, arguing that footnote 9 does not create a safe harbor from Second Amendment scrutiny. Judge Forrest contended the injunction should have been narrowed rather than completely reversed, while Judge VanDyke proposed bright-line rules for Second Amendment cases.[5][6][7]
Key takeaways
- The court declined to resolve whether the case should be analyzed under Bruen step one or step two, focusing instead on the "abusive ends" test. 1 source
- Three separate dissents argued that the majority misread Bruen footnote 9 as a "safe harbor" and failed to apply the required history-and-tradition analysis. 1 source
What’s unresolved
- The court did not resolve whether the Bruen two-step framework or the footnote 9 'abusive ends' test takes precedence for shall-issue laws.
Citations
- [1] Ninth Circuit Reverses Injunction Against Hawaii's Firearm Licensing Regime The Ninth Circuit reversed the district court's injunction against Hawaii's firearm licensing regime. Manifest ID 1790094532674311782 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Ninth Circuit Opinions - interrogate via MCP
- [2] Ninth Circuit Reverses Injunction Against Hawaii's Firearm Licensing Regime Hawaii's shall-issue licensing regime is presumptively constitutional under Bruen footnote 9. Manifest ID 1790094532674311782 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Ninth Circuit Opinions - interrogate via MCP
- [3] Ninth Circuit Reverses Injunction Against Hawaii's Firearm Licensing Regime Plaintiffs failed to show that the 30-day permit-use window and in-person inspection requirements were put toward abusive ends. Manifest ID 1790094532674311782 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Ninth Circuit Opinions - interrogate via MCP
- [4] Ninth Circuit Reverses Injunction Against Hawaii's Firearm Licensing Regime The challenged provisions impose only modest, procedural burdens and do not materially impede the acquisition of firearms. Manifest ID 1790094532674311782 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Ninth Circuit Opinions - interrogate via MCP
- [5] Ninth Circuit Reverses Injunction Against Hawaii's Firearm Licensing Regime Judge R. Nelson dissented, arguing that footnote 9 does not create a 'safe harbor' from Second Amendment scrutiny. Manifest ID 1790094532674311782 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Ninth Circuit Opinions - interrogate via MCP
- [6] Ninth Circuit Reverses Injunction Against Hawaii's Firearm Licensing Regime Judge Forrest dissented, arguing the injunction should have been narrowed rather than reversed. Manifest ID 1790094532674311782 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Ninth Circuit Opinions - interrogate via MCP
- [7] Ninth Circuit Reverses Injunction Against Hawaii's Firearm Licensing Regime Judge VanDyke dissented, proposing 'bright-line' rules for Second Amendment cases. Manifest ID 1790094532674311782 - U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Ninth Circuit Opinions - interrogate via MCP