The court found the defendant's objection to drug quantity was limited to amounts above 500 grams.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - Eighth Circuit Opinions · 2026-07-10 · stated · paraphrase source →
Court opinion streams linked to legal, policy, and regulatory primitives. Agents and reasoning systems can use manifests and metadata to reason about matters, jurisdictions, parties, holdings, and downstream compliance signals.
In the last 168 hours, the Judiciary snapshot synthesized 868 verifiable claims from 139 manifests, produced by 13 live sources across 13 Synorb streams and touching 92 organizations. Every claim carries confidence, evidence type, date, and source provenance, and this page is rebuilt twice daily.
Snapshot as of 2026-07-11T01:25:03Z · rebuilt twice daily · the interactive relationship atlas loads with JavaScript
Last 168 hours contains 868 claims and 139 manifests for this lens. Loudest streams: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit - Seventh Circuit Opinions, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - Eighth Circuit Opinions, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - Fifth Circuit Opinions, and U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit - First Circuit Opinions. Topics discussed: Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Civil Rights, and Criminal Law. Versus the previous saved rebuild, claims changed by +0 from 868 to 868.
Court opinion streams linked to legal, policy, and regulatory primitives. Agents and reasoning systems can use manifests and metadata to reason about matters, jurisdictions, parties, holdings, and downstream compliance signals.
windows/7d.temporal-context-snapshots.json · temporal_context_snapshots · derived from live claims, canonical manifest tags, and source cohorts| Top organizations | Claims · 168h |
|---|---|
| U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit | 461 |
| United States of America | 93 |
| 9th Circuit Court of Appeals | 87 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit | 86 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit | 85 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit | 81 |
| communities | 77 |
| The Bolden Company | 58 |
| Department of Homeland Security | 51 |
| Board of Immigration Appeals | 48 |
| Top topics | Claims · 168h |
|---|---|
| Civil Procedure | 625 |
| Constitutional Law | 515 |
| Civil Rights | 277 |
| Criminal Law | 247 |
| Administrative Law | 241 |
| Labor & Employment | 129 |
| Immigration | 116 |
| Tax | 4 |
| Government Contracts | 68 |
| Healthcare Law | 51 |
| Leading streams | Claims · 168h |
|---|---|
| U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit - Seventh Circuit Opinions | 461 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - Eighth Circuit Opinions | 85 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - Fifth Circuit Opinions | 81 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit - First Circuit Opinions | 39 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit - Eleventh Circuit Opinions | 33 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit - Second Circuit Opinions | 31 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit - Fourth Circuit Opinions | 31 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit - Ninth Circuit Opinions | 26 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit - DC Circuit Opinions | 21 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit - Tenth Circuit Opinions | 18 |
The court found the defendant's objection to drug quantity was limited to amounts above 500 grams.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - Eighth Circuit Opinions · 2026-07-10 · stated · paraphrase source →
Statutory changes to federal penalties generally apply only to offenses committed after the statute's effective date.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit - Eighth Circuit Opinions · 2026-07-10 · stated · direct_quote source →
The case is remanded for discovery and summary judgment proceedings.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit - Seventh Circuit Opinions · 2026-07-10 · stated · direct_quote source →
The threshold question of whether and when the Union and Employers agreed to mandatory arbitration of statutory wage claims was for the district court to decide, not the arbitrator.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit - Second Circuit Opinions · 2026-07-10 · stated · direct_quote source →
The arbitration awards do not preclude the Appellants or Intervenors-Appellants from pursuing wage claims against their former Employers in state court.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit - Second Circuit Opinions · 2026-07-10 · stated · direct_quote source →
The Fifth Circuit's ruling aligns with the Second, First, Sixth, Tenth, and Eleventh Circuits regarding the application of Carson to partial summary judgments.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - Fifth Circuit Opinions · 2026-07-09 · stated · paraphrase source →
The Fifth Circuit remanded the case for the district court to perform the balancing test required for sealing court filings.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit - Fifth Circuit Opinions · 2026-07-09 · stated · direct_quote source →
The Sixth Circuit remanded the case because the government was not served and had not responded to the petition.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit - Sixth Circuit Opinions · 2026-07-09 · stated · direct_quote source →